As mentioned here, Leigh Ann and I didn’t circumcise Nathan. (And neither did the hospital by mistake.) But here’s something I didn’t know: because there’s a huge market for baby foreskins, hospitals don’t throw them away. They sell them for about $1000 a piece.
Check out The Stir today for a post about who’s buying:
Cosmetics: Foreskins are used to make high-end skin creams. The skin products contain fibroblasts grown on the foreskin and harvested from it. One foreskin can be used for decades to produce fancy face cream like the SkinMedica products hawked on Oprah.
Skin grafts: In addition to making products for skin, a baby’s foreskin can be turned into a skin graft for a burn victim. Because the cells are extremely flexible, they’re less likely to be rejected. Currently, this technology can be lifesaving in providing a real skin “band aid” to cover an open wound while a burn victim heals. Researchers at Harvard and Tufts are working on advanced skin replacements that use human foreskins.
Cosmetic testing: All those cruelty-free cosmetics you buy? Some of them are tested on foreskins. This yields better results, since they’re human skin. And it saves the lives of the rodents your shampoo would otherwise be tested on.
I have no idea what to make of all this. But here’s hoping that by the time Nathan turns 18, his foreskin will pay for college.
gasp.
(love your blog, btw. will definitely stop by often.)
Umm, wow! Had no idea.
Well, no testing on my kiddo’s. He still has his!
And seriously, why should the hospital be able to sell it? And if they do, how come the parent’s don’t get most of the profit?
That makes sense. But I wonder how you’d have to declare it on your taxes.
Wow. You have a really lucrative child on your hands. Cheers to Nathan’s foreskin.
That is really weird, but makes since. However, shouldn’t the parents get the money the hospitals sell the skin for? Or at the very least go into a college trust for the child? I’m just sayin’
I do not understand why the public stands still for cosmetic surgery on infants, often without anesthesia, yet gets so upset about animal testing.
I think we need to reconsider why we continue to cut the sex organs of baby boys. There is no medical reason for the cosmetic surgery. Cutting the sex organs of girls became illegal in 1996. It is about time we did the same for baby boys.
Will be interesting to see what becomes of this:
“San Francisco may propose to ban circumcision next year”
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/2010/11/14/2010-11-14_san_francisco_may_propose_to_ban_circumcision_next_year_measure_would_outlaw_gen.html?r=news/national
I was wondering if creams like this would be safe and affective to use on the penis to tighten skin under the head?